OpenAI's agents proved that 3D Navier-Stokes equations can develop singularities — a genuine mathematical achievement. But the credit dispute that followed, involving an NYU mathematician and an Anthropic employee who'd been working the same problem for a year, raised a question that has no clean answer: what happens to independent research when an AI lab can decide to race at it the moment they hear a rumor?
Terminal-Bench-Science v0.1 evaluates AI agents on 70 real computational workflows from active research labs across five scientific domains. Claude Opus 5 tops the leaderboard at 30%, well below the 50–80% range frontier models achieve on general coding benchmarks — a gap that says something useful about where the actual difficulty lies in scientific work.
John Jumper, who led AlphaFold and won the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, is leaving Google DeepMind for Anthropic. The interesting question isn't who won the talent war — it's what his choice says about where the hard problems in biology AI go next, and why a safety-focused lab might actually be the right place to work on them.
Anthropic published a study showing Opus 4.7 matching or beating ChemDraw and MestReNova on 1D NMR spectroscopy tasks. The 80% J-coupling spacing accuracy — versus 26–35% for dedicated software — is the surprising number. The bidirectional structure elucidation capability has no direct equivalent in existing tools.