GPT-5.4 Pro solved Erdős Problem #1196 — a 1968 conjecture about primitive sets — when a 23-year-old amateur fed it the problem in a single prompt. The AI's approach used von Mangoldt weights and a downward Markov chain, a framing that existed in analytic number theory for ninety years but had never been applied here. Terence Tao's explanation for why experts missed it is the most telling part of the story.
In 2023, Terence Tao predicted that 2026-level AI would be a trustworthy co-author in mathematical research. This month he credited ChatGPT Pro with a proof in a real analysis paper — and published a philosophical essay arguing AI is a natural extension of humanity's tool-building tradition. Both together are a data point, not a verdict.
Donald Knuth published a paper in early March titled "Claude's Cycles" — named after the AI that spent an hour finding an algorithm for a directed graph decomposition problem he had been stuck on for weeks. Knuth wrote the formal proof himself; Claude did the search. Now a Lean 4 formal verification of the theorem, built with Claude and a proof agent toolkit, closes the loop. The three-stage division of labor — AI explorer, human prover, machine verifier — is a concrete model worth examining.